This question comes up every year, and I don’t have a good answer. I am a recycler, and I would appreciate a reply as soon as you find out. I heard that there may be some senior homes or organizations that can use them for decorations or to make gift tags out of them. Does this ring any bells?ĭo you know of any organization that will take used Christmas cards? 4, I turn to Joan’s World readers for help. It’s doubtful that’s the case, but you might have picked up on the “clues” others have seen in the film.Īs for No. 2, there long has been debate on whether Preminger intended to end “Laura” by having the whole second half as having been a dream. The victim, however, is a man, not a woman. Not to give too many plot details away, but it involves a murder, blackmail and a dream. 4 for a bit, I found a similar-based film called “The Woman in the Window” (1944). One, you’ve confused the details of the plot two, you are remembering the original “Laura” with an alternate ending three, it was an episode of a television program or four, the movie exists, but I just can’t find it. I couldn’t find the exact film you are thinking of, which brings up a few possibilities. Can you help me or is my memory of this movie “only a dream?” I saw this movie in the 1970s on television and as I recall, it was a black and white movie. It was also a “whodunit.” There were scenes of Laura on a crowded train and, in the end, it turned out that Laura really was “only a dream.” There was no murder because there was no Laura in reality. The movie I am thinking of followed the song very closely. It recently was on television, one of the movie channels, and seeing it reminded me of another movie that I thought was called “Laura,” but obviously I am wrong. The movie “Laura” was made in 1944, directed by Otto Preminger and had an all-star cast. By the end of "Sleepless in Seattle," we're hoping the lovers will meet atop the Empire State Building (a steal from "An Affair to Remember"), and the movie is doing everything to keep that from happening short of assigning Donald Trump to tear it down.I have a question regarding old movies. The plot mechanics, in fact, reminded me of some of those contrived 1940s and 1950s romantic melodramas where events conspired to bring the lovers close but no closer, and then the writers toyed with us bymanufacturing devices to keep them apart. This film, too, keeps its lovers separate most of the time - although there is a fuzzy scene when Ryan stands in the middle of the street and Hanks gawks at her, and bells ring in his libido. And that was fine with me.Įphron's earlier screenplay for " When Harry Met Sally.," starred Ryan and Billy Crystal, and spent a lot of time showing Harry and Sally not meeting. It is about two people who are destined for one another, and that's that. There is no irony, no distance, no angle on the material. Ephron develops this story with all of the heartfelt sincerity of a 1950s tearjerker (indeed, the movie's characters spend a lot of time watching "An Affair to Remember" and using it as their romantic compass). His dad has indeed met a woman, but since she has a laugh that resembles a hyena's mating call, the son doesn't consider her a contender. Meanwhile, in Seattle, we get to know the Hanks character, who is an awfully nice man but very sad, and his son ( Ross Malinger), who hopes his dad will meet the right woman. Something in the man's voice - or maybe something in his soul that is transmitted along with his voice - appeals to Ryan. He thought a change of scenery might help, but apparently it hasn't. The man ( Tom Hanks) is called to the phone and we learn that after his wife died he went into a deep depression before finally packing up his son and moving from Chicago to Seattle. Driving through the night, Ryan listens to the story.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |